Comments on: Linux speeds past OS X (again) http://fak3r.com/2006/05/10/linux-speeds-past-os-x-again/ look out honey, 'cause I'm using technology Sat, 11 Feb 2012 04:52:00 +0000 hourly 1 By: fak3r http://fak3r.com/2006/05/10/linux-speeds-past-os-x-again/#comment-343 fak3r Wed, 21 Jun 2006 02:44:56 +0000 http://cryer.us/fak3r.com/?p=17#comment-343 I've emailed the author of the test to see if he could rerun it with FreeBSD 6.1 running Gnome (just like the Linux test) on the Mac Mini. That would really show the relationship between FreeBSD and OS X. I suspect it'd be somewhere around Windows, speed wise, but am sure it wouldn't hold up to Linux for speed (no flames please, fak3r is powered by FreeBSD and always will be). I’ve emailed the author of the test to see if he could rerun it with FreeBSD 6.1 running Gnome (just like the Linux test) on the Mac Mini. That would really show the relationship between FreeBSD and OS X. I suspect it’d be somewhere around Windows, speed wise, but am sure it wouldn’t hold up to Linux for speed (no flames please, fak3r is powered by FreeBSD and always will be).

]]> By: fak3r http://fak3r.com/2006/05/10/linux-speeds-past-os-x-again/#comment-344 fak3r Wed, 21 Jun 2006 02:44:00 +0000 http://cryer.us/fak3r.com/?p=17#comment-344 I've emailed the author of the test to see if he could rerun it with FreeBSD 6.1 running Gnome (just like the Linux test) on the Mac Mini. That would really show the relationship between FreeBSD and OS X. I suspect it'd be somewhere around Windows, speed wise, but am sure it wouldn't hold up to Linux for speed (no flames please, fak3r is powered by FreeBSD and always will be). I’ve emailed the author of the test to see if he could rerun it with FreeBSD 6.1 running Gnome (just like the Linux test) on the Mac Mini. That would really show the relationship between FreeBSD and OS X. I suspect it’d be somewhere around Windows, speed wise, but am sure it wouldn’t hold up to Linux for speed (no flames please, fak3r is powered by FreeBSD and always will be).

]]>