http://fak3r.com/2007/02/13/fbi-lost-160-laptops-in-last-44-months/ look out honey, 'cause I'm using technology Sat, 11 Feb 2012 04:52:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://fak3r.com/2007/02/13/fbi-lost-160-laptops-in-last-44-months/#comment-585 fak3r Sun, 26 Oct 2008 19:56:30 +0000 http://fak3r.com/2007/02/13/fbi-lost-160-laptops-in-last-44-months/#comment-585 @James Klich II Absolutely - this is a huge problem for the private sector too, but they don't have to publicize those stats. I see more and more need for 'dumb' laptops that only have the OS on it, and need to get documents via a secure method (openssh) from a main, secure server. @James Klich II
Absolutely – this is a huge problem for the private sector too, but they don’t have to publicize those stats. I see more and more need for ‘dumb’ laptops that only have the OS on it, and need to get documents via a secure method (openssh) from a main, secure server.

]]> http://fak3r.com/2007/02/13/fbi-lost-160-laptops-in-last-44-months/#comment-587 fak3r Sun, 26 Oct 2008 19:56:00 +0000 http://fak3r.com/2007/02/13/fbi-lost-160-laptops-in-last-44-months/#comment-587 @James Klich II Absolutely - this is a huge problem for the private sector too, but they don't have to publicize those stats. I see more and more need for 'dumb' laptops that only have the OS on it, and need to get documents via a secure method (openssh) from a main, secure server. @James Klich II
Absolutely – this is a huge problem for the private sector too, but they don’t have to publicize those stats. I see more and more need for ‘dumb’ laptops that only have the OS on it, and need to get documents via a secure method (openssh) from a main, secure server.

]]> http://fak3r.com/2007/02/13/fbi-lost-160-laptops-in-last-44-months/#comment-584 James Klich II Fri, 24 Oct 2008 22:07:17 +0000 http://fak3r.com/2007/02/13/fbi-lost-160-laptops-in-last-44-months/#comment-584 160 laptops in 44 months is too much. The number should be tops 40 laptops or less in a 44 month period. It would be great if the number was zero. This problem may not be the FBIs fault. 160 laptops in 44 months is too much. The number should be tops 40 laptops or less in a 44 month period. It would be great if the number was zero. This problem may not be the FBIs fault.

]]> http://fak3r.com/2007/02/13/fbi-lost-160-laptops-in-last-44-months/#comment-586 James Klich II Fri, 24 Oct 2008 22:07:00 +0000 http://fak3r.com/2007/02/13/fbi-lost-160-laptops-in-last-44-months/#comment-586 160 laptops in 44 months is too much. The number should be tops 40 laptops or less in a 44 month period. It would be great if the number was zero. This problem may not be the FBIs fault. 160 laptops in 44 months is too much. The number should be tops 40 laptops or less in a 44 month period. It would be great if the number was zero. This problem may not be the FBIs fault.

]]> http://fak3r.com/2007/02/13/fbi-lost-160-laptops-in-last-44-months/#comment-583 Tech Blogged » Blog Archive » Do Macs still hold their resale value? Sat, 31 Mar 2007 12:07:29 +0000 http://fak3r.com/2007/02/13/fbi-lost-160-laptops-in-last-44-months/#comment-583 [...] FBI lost 160 laptops in last 44 monthsA new report tells us that the FBI has lost 160 laptops in the last 44 months! Perhaps most troubling, says the report, the FBI could not determine in many cases whether the lost or stolen laptop computers contained sensitive or … [...] [...] FBI lost 160 laptops in last 44 monthsA new report tells us that the FBI has lost 160 laptops in the last 44 months! Perhaps most troubling, says the report, the FBI could not determine in many cases whether the lost or stolen laptop computers contained sensitive or … [...]

]]>