<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: 80G Black iPod classic FTW!</title> <atom:link href="http://fak3r.com/2007/09/06/80g-black-ipod-classic-ftw/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://fak3r.com/2007/09/06/80g-black-ipod-classic-ftw/</link> <description>look out honey &#039;cause I&#039;m using technology</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 10:36:56 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: fak3r</title><link>http://fak3r.com/2007/09/06/80g-black-ipod-classic-ftw/comment-page-1/#comment-23326</link> <dc:creator>fak3r</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 16:44:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://fak3r.com/2007/09/06/80g-black-ipod-classic-ftw/#comment-23326</guid> <description>True that, my wife has the 4G Nano and has the armband so she can wear it when she runs, works perfectly for that.  I can see the shuffle working for something like that or what you&#039;re talking about, my problem is I&#039;m always shifting what I want to hear, so to have to narrow it down...well...it&#039;d be hard.  But darn, those are really small now, and the Nano&#039;s are not!  Hmmm...how many days til xmas?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True that, my wife has the 4G Nano and has the armband so she can wear it when she runs, works perfectly for that.  I can see the shuffle working for something like that or what you&#8217;re talking about, my problem is I&#8217;m always shifting what I want to hear, so to have to narrow it down&#8230;well&#8230;it&#8217;d be hard.  But darn, those are really small now, and the Nano&#8217;s are not!  Hmmm&#8230;how many days til xmas?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: amy</title><link>http://fak3r.com/2007/09/06/80g-black-ipod-classic-ftw/comment-page-1/#comment-23324</link> <dc:creator>amy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 16:30:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://fak3r.com/2007/09/06/80g-black-ipod-classic-ftw/#comment-23324</guid> <description>Hooray Apple!  I was aware of the new releases, but didn&#039;t know that they&#039;d changed the casing on the &quot;classic&quot; iPods.  I&#039;ll definitely have to look into it.I&#039;ve treated the shuffle with disdain, as it initially appeared useless [why in the world would you not be able to control what you listen to?], but I&#039;m actually thinking about getting one now.  I spent a lot of time outside doing yardwork this summer, and my iPod was driving me crazy. It&#039;s not really *big*, but when you&#039;re trying to get something done, or take it running with you, I can now see the appeal of getting a shuffle, loading it up with songs you love and not having to deal with the bulk of the 20 or 30G.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hooray Apple!  I was aware of the new releases, but didn&#8217;t know that they&#8217;d changed the casing on the &#8220;classic&#8221; iPods.  I&#8217;ll definitely have to look into it.</p><p>I&#8217;ve treated the shuffle with disdain, as it initially appeared useless [why in the world would you not be able to control what you listen to?], but I&#8217;m actually thinking about getting one now.  I spent a lot of time outside doing yardwork this summer, and my iPod was driving me crazy. It&#8217;s not really *big*, but when you&#8217;re trying to get something done, or take it running with you, I can now see the appeal of getting a shuffle, loading it up with songs you love and not having to deal with the bulk of the 20 or 30G.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using apc (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/26 queries in 0.021 seconds using memcached

Served from: fak3r.com @ 2010-03-16 07:02:01 -->