This is great, Defcon16 is a mere few days away, but already, the drama has started! Of course there’s the excitement about security guru/celebrity Dan Kaminsky discovering the DNS flaw a few months back that will be revealed this week (so that folks won’t be able to reverse-engineer them to exploit the vulnerability…ahead of time at least), but now there’s a reneg by Apple that’s sure to raise a few feathers, as well as highlight how they weren’t the most forthcoming with their DNS fix (which hasn’t hit yet even though all other vendors have released patches). In an interview, Kaminsky talks about the ‘bug’ he found in DNS, “We got lucky in this particular bug, because it’s a design flaw,” Kaminsky said in an interview. “It shows up in everyone’s network, but the fix is a design fix that doesn’t point directly at what we’re improving.” After peer review it was deemed this was indeed a huge deal, and even the original developer of BIND (the dns software in question) urged everyone to patch. “It took a couple of hours to find the bug,” said Kaminsky, “and a couple of months to fix it.” Kaminsky said he stumbled across the hole in the so-called DNS system for steering people to the websites they are seeking “by complete and total accident.” Smaller DNS flaws have been used before to “poison” the servers that send people to the numerical address of the website name they enter. [...] “This is about the integrity of the Web, this is about the integrity of e-mail,” Kaminsky said. “It’s more, but I can’t talk about how much more.” So learning more about that exploit will be very interesting, and should lead to more people investigating and deploying DNSSEC, a DNS option built with security in mind from the ground up. So there’s that, but now there’s something even more fun because it deals with a companies lack of openness in regards to their security methods. A talk at Black Hat yesterday was scrubbed at the last minute by folks over in marketing at Apple. It seems that they blocked the scheduled presentation that was, “…to give an inside look at the ultra-secretive company’s security response team. “Marketing got wind of it, and nobody at Apple is ever allowed to speak publicly about anything without marketing approval,” a Black Hat organizer told IDG News.” This is unfortunate for Apple, who are reeling after a week of beatings in the ‘blogosphere’ over their handling, or non-handling, of their update for the DNS flaw we mentioned above! “Apple’s policy of saying next to nothing about how it goes about protecting its users from escalating threats is, to say the least, unfortunate. Just last week, the company said it had patched its software from a serious flaw in the net’s address lookup system. Three days after two separate researchers warned Mac clients are still vulnerable to the flaw, Apple hasn’t uttered a word, an omission that generates confusion and doubt in those who depend on the vendor. Apple’s tight-lipped policy.” Come on Apple, you preach about how you’re ‘Open Source’, but then continue along the path of the old school hide and seek ways. Hell, people are already pointing out how their methods are less open than Microsoft’s in releasing information about security. What are they so afraid of? Ah, but we’ll learn more come Thursday, I’ll be in Vegas for my third Defcon and can’t wait. Watch for updates here, or more timely ones over at our Twitter profile.
Recent Comments
- LDN Games on HOWTO build your own open source Dropbox clone
- Rinkesh on Aquadots sweetened with the date-rape drug 1,4-butanediol
- Lars on HOWTO retrieve email with fetchmail and forward it on with procmail
- fak3r » HOWTO automate Debian installs with preseed | Linux Blog on HOWTO automate Debian installs with preseed
- Anti Snore on Racial profiling no better than random screening
Tags
apache apple art bands barack obama bash bsd code debian dubya eff election email features gamer google hacker health howto lighttpd linux mp3 music networking newstudy obama open source phishing politics president rock rock and roll security spam tech terror tv ubuntu unix varnish video games vote web webserver wii

With the barriers lowering, and other market factors creeping in, Macs are slowly
Today at work someone running Windows on a Mac was having an issue communicating through the third party firewall software. The response from the third party was that they don’t support Mac, but my contention is that Mac has nothing to do with someone running Windows, after installing it via Boot Camp. I want to know the answer to this, so I’m posting it here, feel free to educate me if I’m missing something. (Note: names have been changed to protect the (non) supporting party). So, it is my understanding that Boot Camp only installs Windows on a Mac machine (does the partitioning, installs some drivers for the hardware and guides you through installing Windows from an existing CD) after that when you boot the system you can choose Mac’s OS X or Windows, and that after choosing Windows it’s running ‘natively’ on the hardware and not under any kind of virtualization.
It’s time for a new laptop, as I’ve detailed, I’ve ripped apart, 












Home