Tag Archives: politics

Tea partiers: You get mad now?

do you know wtf are you talking about?

another solid argument from a 'tea bagger'

Since the health-care debate brought out the worst in the tea party protesters, we’ve seen a shift from fear mongering, to the disgusting behavior of last weekend that included bigoted, racist name calling, spitting on on elected officials and finally vandalism and death threats.  If it weren’t clear before, the ‘movement’ has truly showed us what is  behind their manufactured anger, and it ain’t health care.  Case in point, how can people be mad now, when they weren’t mad when the previous administration that just walked all over the constitution, sent us into a war with a country that never attacked us and raised the debt to record highs?  Well as I tried to figure out how to condense my thoughts, who would have thought Rosie O’Donnell would have covered it so well, with a post on her blog titled We had eight years of Bush and Cheney, Now you get mad!? One of her readers was able to succinctly break down the blatant hypocrisy of this whole affair, providing a perfect platform for a tea party rebuttal, but don’t expect that, instead lets expect more gay bashing from those cowards.  I’m reprinting the post here (just like the DailyKos did) because it needs more exposure, so please pass it on.  After that, follow-up by reading Frank Rich’s Op-Ed titled The Rage Is Not About Health Care for more rational of what is the true driver for this behavior, it gives us a lot to think about.

Twenty-six Lies About H.R. 3200

factcheck_thumbWith all the craziness around the health care debate, the facts are getting lost.  There is simply no way we’re going to have a productive conversation on the issues when the facts are not known or heeded.  There is a great article on Factcheck.org that debunks many of the non-truths that are being thrown around as justification for calling people Nazis.  Let’s grow up and figure out a way to see both sides without name calling, please review these and expose them to others who are not using facts in their arguments.

Man stabs brother-in-law over political argument

Jose Antonio OrtizI’m all for having opinions, but if a simple disagreement turns to violence, someone must be watching too much tv.  The apparent argument was over a Hillary Clinton-Barack Obama argument! “…Jose Antonio Ortiz, a Clinton supporter, allegedly stabbed his brother-in-law Sean Shurelds in the stomach after they argued over the race for nomination. Shurelds, 41, an Obama supporter, told Ortiz his candidate was “trashing” Clinton, in reference to a string of recent victories by the Illinois senator in preliminary voting in various states. According to the police report, Ortiz replied that “Obama was not a realist” before the argument, in the kitchen of a Pennsylvania home, turned physical. After some mutual choking and punching, the 28-year-old allegedly stabbed Shurelds in the stomach. He has been charged with aggravated assault, among other charges, while Shurelds was flown to a nearby hospital, where he was admitted in critical condition.“  Uggg…so I assume Jose will be voting by ‘absentee’ ballot this year.

Olbermann chronicles Bush's nexus of politics and terror

Watching the “coincidences” between political decisions and terror alerts since 2001 (we’re currently at Bert!) has been a favorite spectator sport of mine, but of course it takes Keith Olbermann to fully chronicle the ongoing Bush legacy.  Called “The Nexus of Politics and Terror” it provides “…the Bush administration’s exploitation of terror threats for political gain. Olbermann’s exhaustive account weaves from each revelation of an intelligence failure or a Democratic political victory to an almost immediate orange alert or “new threat” from al Qaeda. The clip is 17 minutes long and entirely worth it, and its conclusion — “what we were told about terror, and not told, for security reasons, has overlapped considerably with what we were told about terror, and not told, for political reasons” — is a telling summary of our past six years.  It will be interesting to see how history judges these events.

Super Tuesday results

Page 1 of 212