This is just silly, so apparently during her Grammy performace, Amy Winehouse was told to cover up exposed breasts…on one of her tattoos! The reason given was that, “Grammy bosses were scared she’d offend US audiences” with her pin-up girl tattoo on her left upper arm. Really, that
would have offended Americans? “The ‘Back to Black’ star used her trademark black eyeliner to disguise the breasts of a nude girl tattooed on her arm as she performed via satellite link from London at the Grammys. “Amy drew a little black bikini top on the large topless female tattoo on her arm, so as not to offend any of America’s puritanical viewers,” a source told Britain’s Daily Telegraph newspaper.” Now come on, I’m going to need to find another source on this, really, would any of you be offended if you saw a topless tattoo on tv? I would think things like shootings, murders and adultry constantly protrayed on tv shows would be something to focus on rather than an ink drawing of some (giggle) boobies! (giggle, giggle) Pla-lee-zz.
Recent Comments
- LDN Games on HOWTO build your own open source Dropbox clone
- Rinkesh on Aquadots sweetened with the date-rape drug 1,4-butanediol
- Lars on HOWTO retrieve email with fetchmail and forward it on with procmail
- fak3r » HOWTO automate Debian installs with preseed | Linux Blog on HOWTO automate Debian installs with preseed
- Anti Snore on Racial profiling no better than random screening
Tags
apache apple art bands barack obama bash bsd code debian dubya eff election email features gamer google hacker health howto lighttpd linux mp3 music networking newstudy obama open source phishing politics president rock rock and roll security spam tech terror tv ubuntu unix varnish video games vote web webserver wii












Home