As a IT contractor I’m enjoying giving my opinion when asked, and sometimes even when I’m not asked; I have the confidence to be open and honest with everyone and want them to know that. Because of this I’ve been getting to do things I otherwise would not have since they would not have known I was interested or experienced in such things. One of the things I was hired for was to setup Apache on Linux to work with their web instances. It’s been fun, and while I’ve used Apache for over 10 years, there’s always new things to learn. Recently they asked for my opinion on ‘support’ options for Apache. Keeping in mind, they already have support for the hardware and support for the Linux distribution, they still think they need another support channel for Apache. To me this a big waste of money and have somewhat made my case to them. While I understand their position that this support is a way to cover themselves if Apache ‘breaks’, the fact that this software is Open Source has to change the way they have traditionally considered support.
Recent Comments
- m2m news on LinkedIn is spamming all of my Gmail contacts
- LDN Games on HOWTO build your own open source Dropbox clone
- Rinkesh on Aquadots sweetened with the date-rape drug 1,4-butanediol
- Lars on HOWTO retrieve email with fetchmail and forward it on with procmail
- fak3r ยป HOWTO automate Debian installs with preseed | Linux Blog on HOWTO automate Debian installs with preseed
Tags
apache apple art bands barack obama bash bsd code debian dubya eff election email features gamer google hacker health howto lighttpd linux mp3 music networking newstudy obama open source phishing politics president rock rock and roll security spam tech terror tv ubuntu unix varnish video games vote web webserver wii












Home